All Tweets #5,103–#5,152
All 8,402 tweets, newest first. Not including retweets.
-
Chez @TommyHilfiger, pas de refus au premier niveau 🧐 55/
-
Mais où est le bouton "Tout refuser" sur @CalvinKlein ? 🧐 54/
-
Osé chez @thenorthface, il faut avoir l'oeil pour trouver les préférences 🧐 53/
-
On @renaultgroup, same call to @Tapad with the same partner_id... Looking a bit deeper, the referrer is @weborama (which is also used by @lequipe, cf. weborama.com/). L'Équipe/Renault --> Weborama --> Tapad (and many others) Maybe it's time to do some cleaning? 🧹 4/
-
In their privacy policy: "Please note Tapad does not create or offer products in the UK, EU, and EEA" tapad.com/global-privacy-notice 🤥 3/
-
.@Tapad is an identity provider, specialized in "cross-device graph" and now part of @Experian. Its business is highly controversial, as an example, Privacy International filled a GDPR complaint against them adexchanger.com/data-exchanges/tapad-is-shutting-down-its-business-in-europe/ 🤨 2/
-
@Gnppn Oui, vu ce qui se passe avec le RGPD, cela ne pousse pas à l’optimisme !
-
@Zaratounga @Gnppn Oui voilà, c’est beaucoup leur demander
-
@benoitjamar De contacter des utilisateurs WhatsApp depuis iMessage ?
-
@Gnppn C’est vrai :-) De là à faire bouger Facebook pour prioriser un tel changement dans leur roadmap ? C’est là où j’ai un sérieux doute 😏
-
Autre avis biaisé, mais cette fois-ci dans l'autre sens, par le co-fondateur de Matrix matrix.org/blog/2022/03/25/interoperability-without-sacrificing-privacy-matrix-and-the-dma
-
Beaucoup d'ingénieurs de Facebook (ou ex. Facebook) pour dire que côté vie privée, ça va poser problème (!) Il faut s'attendre à un lobbying intense 🤔 theverge.com/2022/3/28/23000148/eu-dma-damage-whatsapp-encryption-privacy
-
Le DMA imposera l'interopérabilité des messageries WhatsApp, Messenger ou iMessage. Mais j'ai du mal à croire que cela puisse se faire en pratique. Techniquement, cela ne parait déjà pas simple... Et WhatsApp est déjà ultra réticent à bouger l'orteil cf. platformer.news/p/three-ways-the-european-union-might
-
RT @Thomasbcn: Words: "helping Ukraine" Actions: comply with Putin perspective theintercept.com/2022/03/28/google-russia-ukraine-war-censorship/
-
More context: Google Analytics has been declared illegal in the EU by some DPAs for this exact same reason, fear of the US intelligence surveillance 🧐
-
Replace Google & Facebook with Yandex, US with Russia, and now we are seeing the risks caused by those ubiquitous SDKs ⤵️ @PatrickMcGee_/1508675131199033344
-
RT @aripap: Morality Test! In this thread 🧵I present various ways of targeting digital ads. Give us your opinion on the moral OK-ness of th…
-
RT @nandoodles: How are you going to block your ads from Russian propaganda networks if @Google hides the ownership of nearly all the websi…
-
RT @DinaSrinivasan: Thread on how EU and US government agencies tap user data that's commercially available to track users/citizens and con…
-
RT @WolfieChristl: Remarkable report by the Dutch Review Committee on the Intelligence and Security Services (CTIVD) that discusses how "op…
-
RT @sorianotech: Pourquoi l’adoption du Digital markets act #DMA 🇪🇺 est si importante 👇🏽1/17
-
Few words which says a lot about technosolutionists: - Think tech can solve every problem on earth - Despise and don't understand anything about regulations I mean, how do you quantify the GDPR impact? 🤔 @alexstamos/1507366543360897028
-
@yigityazgi @RickDronkers Well, that was quick... Let's see how it goes this time, cf. noyb.eu/en/privacy-shield-20-first-reaction-max-schrems
-
“Data combination and cross use will only be possible with explicit consent,” said Schwab. “This is especially true for the purpose of advertising and also applies to combination with third-party data (e.g., Facebook with third parties). 💪 @jason_kint/1507168657205608451
-
RT @finnmyrstad: So, the DMA has been adopted! Will read the details & hear analysis from friends closer to the details than me. But it see…
-
@_RedFrog Oui, c'est imposé par l'IAB Europe dans le cadre du TCF ! A.k.a. c'est la même sur 80% des pop-ups en Europe ! Et illégal dans l'UE depuis la décision de l'APD
-
More power to Server-Side Tagging ⤵️ @SimoAhava/1507056865410265089
-
RT @mntd_: Trois groupements d'éditeurs anglais se sont émus de ce que certaines adtech utilisent leurs contenus pour créer des segments de…
-
@alextcone @judyshapiro @pbannist Sorry, I agree for those initiatives But ads-related initiatives like their Encrypted Signals Program in Google Ad Manager goes into the opposite direction
-
The correct article: “Google’s Encrypted Signals Program Just Entered Open Beta, And Here’s What You Need To Know About It” adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/googles-encrypted-signals-program-just-entered-open-beta-and-heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-it/ 👀 5/
-
Le document est bien public et déjà partagé sur ce thread, "Safeguards for international data transfers with Google's advertising and analytics products" services.google.com/fh/files/misc/safeguards_for_international_data_transfers.pdf Un passage clé, l'anonymisation de l'IP est effectuée dans l'UE 🧐 32/
-
RT @johnnyryan: I and @Cristianapt have a new paper examining whether IAB Europe's solutions can fix the problems of the TCF. Do the "Ven…
-
Google (translated): "Google says it won’t trade on email-based identifiers, once the data is encrypted as an ESP, Google doesn’t know what it is and therefore will allow the ID to be traded on its exchange" adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/thursday-11042021/ 🪄 4/
-
Google (cryptic communication): "We are building a new feature to enable publishers to securely share encrypted signals with Authorized Buyers and Open Bidders via Ad Manager" blog.google/products/admanager/new-ways-publishers-activate-first-party-data/ 🤔 3/
-
Google hypocritical stance: "We will not build alternate identifiers to track individuals as they browse across the web, nor will we use them in our products" blog.google/products/ads-commerce/a-more-privacy-first-web/ 🧐 1/
-
@yigityazgi @RickDronkers (Ideally by changing the US surveillance laws, otherwise we’ll have a Schrems III decision)
-
@yigityazgi @RickDronkers A successor political agreement to the invalidated Privacy Shield? Otherwise, it will be complicated…
-
@aeris22 @rbessuges @Miss_libert @geve82 @Desmazieres @axeptio_eu @CNIL Bien d’accord, la CNIL est schizophrène
-
@aeris22 @rbessuges @Miss_libert @geve82 @Desmazieres @axeptio_eu @CNIL Malheureusement, la CNIL n'est pas cohérente avec elle-même 🙁 @pixeldetracking/1476636363671883776
-
@RickDronkers Thank you! I admit I don’t find the time for the translations… I discovered recently that one guy did the work for one of my articles (chromium.woolyss.com/f/HTML-Google-Tag-Manager-the-new-anti-adblock-weapon.html) but I don’t know who it is!

















