All Tweets #4,403–#4,452
All 8,402 tweets, newest first. Not including retweets.
-
So much bullshit in that Google article... Google Analytics would never track you accross sites or apps? 🤔 Well not really, just check how GA can be used for behavioral reporting and retargeting support.google.com/analytics/answer/7532985?hl=en 😈 1/ @Thomasbcn/1481923114242129920
-
Sur iOS, c'est évidemment la même avec l'appli #Elyze : constitution de base de données d'opinions politiques, sans recueil de consentement. Regardons maintenant les "CGU & Politique de confidentialité d'ELYZE" nifty-option-15c.notion.site/CGU-Politique-de-confidentialit-d-ELYZE-563c3cdb31c9465da8e6749c0c4760d1 🧐 1/ @U039b/1482734656562806790
-
Non merci @RevolutApp, je n'ai pas envie de votre retargeting 🧐 62/
-
La cupidité, illustration ⤵️ Forcé d'ouvrir l'App Store à des modes de paiement alternatifs pour les applis de rencontres au Pays-Bas, Apple compte toujours prendre une commission mobiledevmemo.com/apple-just-clarified-alternative-payments-on-ios-spoiler-apple-still-takes-a-commission/ @GeradinLaw/1483010187636191232
-
RT @WolfieChristl: Google makes billions and billions of the unprecedented control it has over our global digital infrastructure, economies…
-
"Taken more broadly this could in theory impact every client based 3rd party resource loaded by a EU site, as the site exposes the IP Address of the user via the resource request load." 🍿 @randomnessncats/1482788703290511360
-
@amnesty 👋 Then why is @amnesty leaking my data to Google & Facebook? @pixeldetracking/1483090097952153603?s=21
-
So where is the reject button (bis)? It's in fact the little cross next to the settings button... Note the misleading message from @amnesty: "We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can use this tool to change your cookie settings." 🤪 5/
-
Now if you click on "Accept recommended cookies" and do not alter the other toggles which are in fact "Off", you will be monitored by Google and Facebook 😜 "Recommended cookies" ≠ "Essential cookies" And @amnesty recommends Google & Facebook "invasive monitoring" 😈 4/
-
"The constant and invasive monitoring of our lives to target people with ads is unacceptable" Claudia Prettner, Legal and Policy Adviser at Amnesty Tech Did she talk with Amnesty marketing & tech teams? 🤔 Let's have a look at @amnesty website... 🧵 1/ @amnesty/1483021773973168129
-
RT @MaxArt2501: This is the result of Apple's browser engine monopoly: every security bug in WebKit leaves users with no way to avoid the p…
-
RT @jaffathecake: This is a huge bug. On OSX, Safari users can (temporarily) switch to another browser to avoid their data leaking across o…
-
(autre que Safari)
-
Se faire basher par Google sur la vie privée, c'est un peu gênant... À quand la possibilité d'installer un vrai navigateur sur iOS ? infrequently.org/2021/08/webkit-ios-deep-dive/ @slightlylate/1482462646066507780
-
RT @slightlylate: iOS's cadence of showstopping web bugs (with no recourse because of the #AppleBrowserBan) is becoming indistinguishable f…
-
RT @SomeGadgetGuy: Apple doesn't sell your data, they give it away for free! It just works! fingerprintjs.com/blog/indexeddb-api-browser-vulnerability-safari-15/ But seriously, keep an…
-
RT @U039b: Je me suis penchée sur l'application #elize dont tout le monde parle. Elle n'est pas sans controverse. Et sa sécurité est lacuna…
-
@ANderagakura @AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap Yes, but they would still benefit from implementing multiple bids and loss notifications right? They might feel that they have better things to prioritize
-
@ANderagakura @AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap Other option is coercition: I will stop buying on your SSP if you don’t implement X, Y & Z. But does it really work between the big players?
-
@ANderagakura @AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap Obviously it’s an industry effort, how can you convince everyone to make the leap? With tangible ROI figures, product teams from DSPs & SSPs may prioritize those improvements
-
@ANderagakura @AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap Many improvements to make in the programmatic pipelines, I wonder if there could be case studies for RTB players, examples: - implementing multiple bids, Criteo improved it’s win rate by X%, it’s revenue by Y% - implementing loss notifications, OpenX saved Z% infra cost
-
@AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap You are right indeed, I forget about 1st price (when I left adtech, it was not yet the norm). Then I guess it’s in everyone interest that DSPs are able to submit multiple bids? Except if you are on both sides of the market, like Google
-
@AIicia @mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap It’s not related to 1st price auction: if the SSP is compatible, a DSP could send multiple bids for a given opportunity. This would be better for publishers: higher bid density, better fill rate
-
RT @profcarroll: Unsealed evidence in lawsuit points to Google being worse than even its most ardent critics could even imagine. Mind-bendi…
-
RT @OdiaKagan: @EU_EDPS on @EUparliament use of Google analytics (not just #SchremsII) 1/14 #dataprivacy #dataprotection #cryandpray http…
-
In fact, in the little murky adtech world, most DSPs (buying platforms) will do that, you don’t want your clients (advertisers) to compete with themselves… But Google also control the auctions, they can adjust the bids from their buying tools to win, they can hide their margins @aripap/1482072007768522757
-
@mrjordanbentley @SarahSluis @aripap A DSP can, but: - it has to be supported by the SSP (not always the case) - you run the risk to make your advertisers pay more cause they are also competing with themselves in the SSP auction The blocking rules is true, a benefit yes but is if enough?
-
Don’t be evil? 🤔 Un nouvel exemple de comment Google manipule les marchés publicitaires pour son propre bénéfice (et extorque les médias au passage) @leah_nylen/1482052845973262336
-
La captation de vos données personnelles par Google pour son propre profit, lorsque vous lisez des articles de presse, cela se passe ici business.safety.google/gdpr/ Google se place en tant que responsable indépendant du traitement des données personnelles 😈 @CNIL/1481217743277932545
-
Quelques vérifications à effectuer du côté de Google du coup 🤔 business.safety.google/gdpr/ @CNIL/1481217743277932545
-
@alexanderhanff If you win this case, next step is to go after Google support.google.com/admob/answer/10105530
-
@Aristweet @bgadomski Bien vu 👍😁
-
@imissmymonkey J’ai pas checké pour cette newsletter ;)
-
Abonnez-vous, c’est un must 👌 @SimoAhava/1480900946733551617
-
RT @fourmeux: Ok Google, donc la CNIL t'inflige une amende en 2020 pour non respect de la législation en matière de 🍪 et tu considères qu'e…
-
@JfmbLinux @PrivacyWashing Plutôt la 2ème option ^^ Ils utilisent les outils Facebook, et peut-être payent-ils pour des publicités
-
@Cellular_PP @MatouEcureuil @MarianneleMag @CNIL Je l’avais noté, déjà une belle collection @pixeldetracking/1460299875426480137
-
Difficile d'éviter le @PrivacyWashing de Facebook sur Twitter 🧐 7/
-
@Thomasbcn Without strong regulation or high CO2 compensation price, there is no benefit to invest in CO2 capture. But the fossil companies have incentives to make you believe that it has potential (so they can keep on digging)
-
RT @WolfieChristl: Repeat after me: Trying to replace profiling based on browser and device IDs with profiling based on email addresses is…
-
RT @lockheimer: We’re not asking Apple to make iMessage available on Android. We’re asking Apple to support the industry standard for moder…
-
RT @jack: “It seems like we should take notice that from the very beginning, these technologies immediately tended towards centralization t…



















