All Tweets #5,753–#5,802
All 8,402 tweets, newest first. Not including retweets.
-
RT @Moonalice: I love this lawsuit. As far as I know, Amazon has ALWAYS used Alexa for targeting. I am pretty sure they have acknowledged i…Permalink On twitter.com
Retweet
-
RT @doctorow: On the one hand, Facebook's comments to the @NTIAgov on Apple's market power are supremely ironic. *Facebook*, complaining ab…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
RT @wikileaks: "This should shock and concern everyone..this decision is a grave threat to freedom of speech, not just for Julian but for e…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Les autorités de la concurrence sont globalement bien plus efficaces que les autorités de protection des données... 😢 ...autre exemple avec la CMA (UK) et la Privacy Sandbox de Google competitionandmarkets.blog.gov.uk/2022/02/24/cma-secures-final-privacy-sandbox-commitments-from-google/ 💪Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
À noter que Google, sous pression de la Commission européenne, pourrait également ré-ouvrir l'inventaire YouTube à des plateformes d'achat tierces reuters.com/technology/exclusive-google-offers-let-ad-rivals-place-youtube-ads-eu-antitrust-probe-2022-06-13/ 👀Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
Facebook + Criteo, c'est pas la joie côté vie privée. Mais pour l'Autorité de la Concurrence, c'est un 2ème succès, après Google l'année dernière autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/fr/article/lautorite-de-la-concurrence-sanctionne-google-hauteur-de-220-millions-deuros-pour-avoir Succès basé sur une excellente compréhension du marché de la publicité en ligne 👍Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
Mood +2 🙂
-
Retour du retargeting Criteo sur Facebook et Instagram 👏💩 @Adlc_/1537365618999103488Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 6 Favorites
Mood 0
-
RT @Snowden: À mon avis, chaque parti politique devrait être confronté à une demande de prise de position sur l'extradition de Julian Assan…Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @Snowden: Bonne chance. Le monde en a besoin.Permalink On twitter.com
-
En pratique, votre email, prénom, nom et numéro de téléphone fuitent vers Facebook 💩 4/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 8 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
Autre formulaire d'inscription, même promesse 🤔 3/Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
Vs. la pratique : fuite de votre email, prénom, nom et numéro de téléphone vers la plateforme de levée de fonds @engagingnetwork 🤪 2/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 11 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Sur @greenpeacefr, la théorie : vos données personnelles ne seront ni vendues, ni échangées 🧐 1/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 16 Retweets
❤️ 16 Favorites
Mood 0
-
@gwouigwoui @amnesty @AmnestyTech Le pixel oui, malheureusement les fuites sont aussi côté serveur @pixeldetracking/1412519363702370309Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
Using Data to Make Abortion ‘Unthinkable’ revealnews.org/article/facebook-data-abortion-crisis-pregnancy-center/, thanks to the Facebook Pixel 👏 35/Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +4 🙂
-
"The pixel sent Facebook not just the name of the doctor and her field of medicine but also the first name, last name, email address, phone number, zip code, and city of residence we entered into the booking form." 🤖 @themarkup/1537400867829297152Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 4 Retweets
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Au passage, @amnesty fuite aussi votre email à Snapchat 🧐 3/Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 8 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Gênant pour une organisation qui dénonce le capitalisme de surveillance, non ? amnestyfr.cdn.prismic.io/amnestyfr/17b86683-f39a-4e52-91ea-a66969a6686f_POL_30-1404-2019_Surveillance+Giants_FR.pdf 🤔 2/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 21 Favorites
Mood 0
-
.@amnesty fuite votre email, votre prénom, votre nom et votre code postal à Facebook lorsque vous vous inscrivez sur son site 😵💫 1/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 20 Retweets
❤️ 38 Favorites
Mood 0
-
@btsavage @swodinsky ExactlyPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood 0
-
@btsavage @swodinsky So that if Apple's tracking definition is incorrect, the correct definition is applied to everybodyPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@btsavage @swodinsky I would like those topics (IDFV, cross-app sharing) mentioned when adtech pundits complain about Apple policy, no more double standardPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
RT @RobertJBateman: The 5 stages of cookie grief: 1. Denial (Targeted ads are essential!) 2. Anger (So you HATE small businesses?) 3. Barg…Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @RobertJBateman: "Comfort cookies" is a new one to me.Permalink On twitter.com
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
-
@btsavage @swodinsky To consider Apple Personalized Ads as tracking, you would need to agree with the consequences. Without ATT opt-in: - no more IDFV - no more crossing data across different context at Facebook or GooglePermalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
@btsavage @swodinsky Maybe your (good) arguments would have more strength if there was no double standard in the adtech industry? - why is IDFV not opt-in? - why are Google and Facebook allowed to cross user data across context when user say no to ATT? - why is Google pushing for FPS?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +3 🙂
-
RT @dmehro: NEW: Facebook is collecting sensitive data about visitors of crisis pregnancy center websites - full names, phone numbers, and…Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @lawgirl821: This should be watched closely: judge found the plaintiff’s alleged injury due to the company’s practices and plausibly arg…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Using Data to Make Abortion “Unthinkable”, with Facebook 💩 themarkup.org/pixel-hunt/2022/06/15/facebook-and-anti-abortion-clinics-are-collecting-highly-sensitive-info-on-would-be-patientsPermalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
Mood -1 🙁
-
“Facebook is right that users should be able to choose app stores other than Apple, and Apple is wrong to claim that users who are given this choice will be exposed to predatory and invasive apps.” eff.org/deeplinks/2022/06/facebook-says-apple-too-powerful-theyre-rightPermalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -5 🙁
-
“We are further challenged by app store rules designed to keep out Gecko, our independent browser engine that powers Firefox, Tor and other browsers.” 🍎 blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/calling-for-antitrust-reform/Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
Only one real browser on iOS? The CMA concluded that the WebKit restriction is unlikely to be justified by security concerns. theplatformlaw.blog/2022/06/14/the-cma-final-report-on-the-mobile-ecosystems-market-study-a-repudiation-of-apples-narrative-over-privacy-and-safety-as-justifications-for-the-status-quo/Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -1 🙁
-
@alfu51 @sebsauvage_net @fourmeux @mozilla Sur la screenshot: "You can disable Fraudulent Website Warnings in Safari at any time by going to Settings > Safari, then tapping to turn off Fraudulent Website Warning."Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -14 🙁
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Amazon, le roi du #darkpattern 👑Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 3 Retweets
❤️ 10 Favorites
Mood +3 🙂
-
@FabriceSimonet @sebsauvage_net @alfu51 @fourmeux @mozilla Là c’est un peu différent, pas de rapport avec les solutions marketing server-side de GooglePermalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
@othermaciej Hello! Is the proxy also active for Tencent (cf. blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2019/10/13/dear-apple-safe-browsing-might-not-be-that-safe/)?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
@alfu51 @sebsauvage_net @fourmeux @mozilla donc sur Safe Browsing & Tencent blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2019/10/13/dear-apple-safe-browsing-might-not-be-that-safe/ si Apple fait passer les requêtes vers Tencent via un proxy, j'ai du mal à comprendre qu'il y ait encore un risque @othermaciej/1359736220809531393Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@alfu51 @sebsauvage_net @fourmeux @mozilla à noter que Firefox s'appuie aussi sur Google support.mozilla.org/fr/kb/comment-fonctionne-protection-contre-hame%C3%A7onnage-et-logiciels-malveillantsPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@alfu51 @sebsauvage_net @fourmeux @mozilla Plus de détail ici theverge.com/2019/10/14/20913680/apple-tencent-privacy-controversy-safe-browsing-blacklist-explainerPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@FascinatingTech @garjoh_canuck @CMAgovUK @Apple @johnnyryan @Google Unfortunately the Irish regulator is not really helpfulPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
@FascinatingTech @garjoh_canuck @CMAgovUK @Apple Yes, and unfortunately their narrative is often getting tractionPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
@FascinatingTech @garjoh_canuck @CMAgovUK @Apple If the adtech people cry so much about Apple Personalized Ads, why we don't hear them when Google & Facebook are doing far worse?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -4 🙁
-
@FascinatingTech @garjoh_canuck @CMAgovUK @Apple That's a shame, cause I am far more concerned by Google mixing user data across it's numerous services for multiple purposes, without any proper legal basis but dark patterns everywhere.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -3 🙁
-
- Google Chrome upcoming First-Party Sets should be opt-in (allows to share cookies between google search, maps, youtube, etc) - The Adtech Content Fortress strategy would be at risk mobiledevmemo.com/content-fortresses-and-the-new-privacy-landscape/ - Etc So maybe adtech should stop being hypocritical?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -4 🙁
-
Should Apple Personalized Ads be considered as "tracking"? The adtech people: yes of course, it's a serious abuse. Hence Apple should change its "tracking" definition and display the ATT tracking pop-up, instead of this more "positive" pop-upPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
