pixeldetracking’s Twitter Archive

All Tweets #703–#752

All 8,402 tweets, newest first. Not including retweets.

…in reply to @niko_jaimes
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet Côté abus de position dominante sur les marchés publicitaires, il y aurait sans doute une belle plainte à lancer contre Google (cf. pixeldetracking.com/fr/la-domination-publicitaire-de-google)
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @niko_jaimes
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet Oui je comprends l'angle d'attaque (et peut-être que cela marchera), mais comme tu/vous dites, pour qui connait le marché publicitaire, Apple n'est pas un vrai concurrent (et l'on peut douter qu'il le soit un jour).
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @niko_jaimes
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet Honnêtement, le business publicitaire d'Apple est "naissant" depuis 10 ans déjà (feu iAd), je doute qu'ils profitent d'une redistribution des budgets pub (il faudra plutôt regarder du côté de Google et Facebook)
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @niko_jaimes
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet Pour la position dominante, je pense qu'il faudrait bien définir le périmètre : - Si c'est la pub sur les applications, Apple est minuscule. - Si c'est les App Store, effectivement, mais l'abus est différent (cf. les plaintes de Epic Games, Spotify...)
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @pixeldetracking
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet Donc oui, l'opt-out d'Apple sur son propre ciblage 1st party n'est pas "clean", mais ce n'est pas le même sujet
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood +2 🙂
…in reply to @niko_jaimes
@niko_jaimes @rochemathieu @Apple @pierem @journaldunet pour moi on mélange 2 sujets différents : 1) Apple demande maintenant de l'opt-in sur le tracking x-app (c'est son choix, c'est cohérent avec Safari sur le web) 2) Apple n'interdit pas à un éditeur d'utiliser sa 1st party pour du ciblage (en effet, cela favorise les gros)
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @rochemathieu
@rochemathieu @Apple @niko_jaimes @pierem @journaldunet It seems like the complaint doesn't understand that Apple is targeting 3rd-party tracking, not 1st-party
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
…in reply to @_RDemol
@_RDemol Are you refering to this? developer.apple.com/app-store/user-privacy-and-data-use/ Tracking refers to the act of linking user or device data collected from your app with user or device data *collected from other companies’ apps, websites, or offline properties* Again, 3rd-party is not 1st-party
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood -1 🙁
…in reply to @_RDemol
@_RDemol Well yes, I understand that when you are a big publisher, it's easier to propose personnalized ads solely based on your own data. It doesn't mean x-app tracking should have a "free-pass" in order for smaller publishers to compete...
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood +2 🙂
RT @kyotonio: "privacy-first IDs" "consented user data" "encrypted email addresses" 🙊 adexchanger.com/data-exchanges/the-trade-desk-and-liveramp-unite-on-identity-unified-id-2-0-to-become-part-of-liveramps-ats/
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 29
RT @kyotonio: "we found that a whopping 73% of users clicked ‘ok’ and opted in to ad tracking" Not too surprised, people have been trained…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 29
…in reply to @_RDemol
@_RDemol The non valid consent is off topic, other apps are still technically able to use 1st party tracking for whatever they want (same on Safari)
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood +3 🙂
…in reply to @_RDemol
@_RDemol What I see is coherent, devs must ask for permission to allow third-party tracking: - Storage access API on WebKit - AppTrackingTransparency on iOS Apps
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 29 Mood +1 🙂
RT @TheRegister: Brave browser first to nix CNAME deception, the sneaky DNS trick used by marketers to duck privacy controls https://t.co/n…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 29
RT @PrivacyMatters: “Google is planning an aggressive campaign targeted against French commissioner Thierry Breton and other regulators in…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 29
Also, the Apple opt-out is 1st-party (Apple News & AppStore), not 3rd party tracking. So I don’t see the hypocrisy @nicolasrieul/1321573535584759811
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2020 Oct 29 Mood 0
Will Criteo stop using CNAME cloaking @nicolasrieul ? @nicolasrieul/1321573535584759811
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites 2020 Oct 29 Mood -1 🙁
RT @robinberjon: C’est vraiment désolant de voir cette décision. Partager des identifiants *encourage* les monopoles. Apple — pour une fois…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 28
"Search marketing experts also point to increased activity from Applebot, the iPhone maker’s once-obscure web crawler, which is used to build the vast database of online material that forms the foundation of any search engine" ft.com/content/fd311801-e863-41fe-82cf-3d98c4c47e26
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 2 Favorites 2020 Oct 28 Mood +1 🙂
…in reply to @GeradinLaw
@GeradinLaw thanks for the answer
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 28 Mood +2 🙂
…in reply to @GeradinLaw
@GeradinLaw Do you know where we can read the complaint?
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 28 Mood -2 🙁
L'Équipe, dernier sur les métriques d'expérience utilisateur Google lorsque l'on compare 50 sites média impression.co.uk/blog/core-web-vitals-study-global-publications/ 😵 Et... champion de la surveillance publicitaire pixeldetracking.com/fr/abonne-a-lequipe-mais-surveille 🤬 Mauvaise expérience utilisateur et surveillance vont souvent de pair 😬
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites 2020 Oct 28 Mood +2 🙂
…in reply to @SimoAhava
@SimoAhava @kyotonio @randomnessncats Indeed, I have no CNAME
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 28 Mood -1 🙁
…in reply to @kyotonio
@kyotonio @SimoAhava @randomnessncats From non self-hosted providers right? I have a self-hosted Piwik
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 28 Mood 0
RT @kyotonio: "The Centralized Consent API aims to reduce the need for a website to display consent banners while still complying with cons…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 28
RT @brave: Brave now uses an enhanced ad blocking solution to counter the increasingly common practice of CNAME-cloaked tracking scripts (a…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 27
RT @GeradinLaw: Here is our latest post on the Platform Law Blog on an incredibly important issue, which is that big tech platforms such as…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 26
Encore une excellente analyse, avec un focus sur les SDK publicitaires, dans les applications Android des éditeurs média français @AymericMlo/1320678283885924352
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites 2020 Oct 26 Mood 0
…in reply to @undefined
@JuriXtl @MissIG_Geek @Turblog @reesmarc @U039b Bonjour ! N’étant pas sur Android, je ne saurais dire
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 26 Mood -3 🙁
RT @airavn: So Mozilla criticizes the antitrust case against Google, because Mozilla relies on Google funding. When your alleged competito…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 26
D'où l'intérêt d'avoir des marchés publicitaires qui fonctionnent équitablement, ce qui n'est malheureusement pas le cas, cf. pixeldetracking.com/fr/la-domination-publicitaire-de-google @F_Kaltheuner/1320656132604612608
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2020 Oct 26 Mood 0
RT @FantaAlexx: One can learn much from Google. For instance how to outsmart the publishing industry. @roofjoke and I spent the past mont…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 26
Google AI Tech Will Be Used for Virtual Border Wall, CBP Contract Shows theintercept.com/2020/10/21/google-cbp-border-contract-anduril/
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 26 Mood 0
@GeradinLaw Hello, I wrote an article in french on Google Ads Markets domination pixeldetracking.com/fr/la-domination-publicitaire-de-google I quoted your studies (thanks for those)
Permalink On twitter.com Mention 2020 Oct 25 Mood +2 🙂
La domination des marchés publicitaires de Google : L'absence de régulation a permis au géant californien d'imposer sa loi sur le web pixeldetracking.com/fr/la-domination-publicitaire-de-google
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 10 Favorites 2020 Oct 25 Mood 0
…in reply to @arnaud_blc
@arnaud_blc @niko_jaimes @journaldunet Un problème plus fondamental (mais hors-sujet) : FLoC parle d'amélioration de la prédiction de conversion, mais l'utilisateur aurait-il aussi converti sans publicité ? (est-ce que la publicité marche vraiment ?!) Corrélation n'est pas causalité
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 24 Mood 0
…in reply to @arnaud_blc
@arnaud_blc @niko_jaimes @journaldunet Aussi, Google n'a pas cherché à mesurer un taux de mémorisation du message publicitaire. "Recall" fait référence aux faux négatifs, cf. fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%A9cision_et_rappel De manière simplifiée : est-ce que les FLoC permettent de "trouver" plus de personnes ayant converti ?
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 24 Mood 0
…in reply to @arnaud_blc
@arnaud_blc @niko_jaimes @journaldunet La catégorisation de sites (5 catégories, 3 niveaux) est une des variables testées par Google, en entrée de l'algorithme d'établissement des cohortes (MinHash en l'occurence).
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 24 Mood 0
…in reply to @arnaud_blc
@arnaud_blc @niko_jaimes @journaldunet Important oui, mais l'étude de Google n'est pas bien comprise : Google ne se base pas sur les centres d'intérêt et conversions pour établir les cohortes. Il s'en sert pour évaluer la viabilité des algorithmes de constitution des cohortes, pour du ciblage publicitaire
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 24 Mood +2 🙂
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards But if I read correctly, the cohorts are created by the browser, SSPs wouldn’t have a say on contextual formulas. Or do you suggest browsers would open the option to 3rd parties?
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 24 Mood 0
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards I see thanks, this is the missing part in my understanding
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood 0
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards Ok thanks! Answers my fears here
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood +2 🙂
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards Or a large website knowing your name: will it also get your FLoC id? If yes, it could infer a lot more about you
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood +1 🙂
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards Yes but I wonder, say the advertising company already have an unique identifier and information about you, getting to know the FLoC id could be very revealing
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood +1 🙂
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards I like this argument in the article: flock names will be more meaningful to those who are already capable of observing activity around the web Thanks to FLoC, those companies will be able to derive more information
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood +7 🙂
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards I am afraid of dark patterns regarding how pre-processing consent would be obtained, seeing how consent is gathered today :-/ Hence the critic on trackers: "In Google’s future, they will sit back, relax, and let your browser do the work for them."
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood 0
…in reply to @lukOlejnik
@lukOlejnik What would you answer to EFF critic, calling FLoC "Ugly" eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/dont-play-googles-privacy-sandbox-1 ?
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 23 Mood -5 🙁
…in reply to @thezedwards
@thezedwards What would you answer to EFF critic, calling FLoC "Ugly" eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/dont-play-googles-privacy-sandbox-1 ?
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2020 Oct 23 Mood -5 🙁
…in reply to @rbessuges
@rbessuges @Cellular_PP @reesmarc Ça sent pas bon en effet
Permalink On twitter.com 2020 Oct 22 Mood 0
RT @stratechery: United States v. Google The Justice Department's lawsuit against Google is appropriately narrow, and if it fails it gives…
Permalink On twitter.com Retweet 2020 Oct 22