pixeldetracking’s avatarpixeldetracking’s Twitter Archive—№ 5,747

    1. …in reply to @garjoh_canuck
      @garjoh_canuck @RickDronkers Define tracking: A) Across Sites/Apps from different vendors (Apple ATT with IDFV still available, but also Google First Party Sets) B) Also across Sites/Apps from same vendor I think option B better aligns with what users expect
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
  1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
    @garjoh_canuck @RickDronkers But then, you have to call out all the existing issues (and not only ATT supposed self preference): - IDFV still available - No opt-in for Google/Facebook personalized ads (across Sites/Apps), complicated opt-out - Google First Party Sets
    On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
      @garjoh_canuck @RickDronkers Adtech can’t have it both ways: complaining that Apple is not doing enough regarding tracking and not looking at the much worse situation of the other players. If you consider Apple personalized ads as tracking (I do), yes ATT should apply
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -4 🙁
      1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
        @garjoh_canuck @RickDronkers But then, Google and Facebook shouldn’t be allowed to do personalized ads, crossing data across different 1st party context. That’s what they do with Search, YouTube, Maps, Facebook, Instagram, etc
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0