pixeldetracking’s avatarpixeldetracking’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,376

  1. Adtech lobbyists debunk: No "unfair" treatment here, reporting for Apple Ads is detailed, but it's the same for Google on their iOS Apps, for Facebook on their iOS Apps... 1st-party "personnalized" advertising is not impacted by ATT, Apple or not. @eric_seufert/1387044025442594819 1/
    On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 14 Favorites Mood -5 🙁
    1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
      Misleading language, ad network usually refer to 3rd-party ads, not the case here. @eric_seufert/1387044027095076865 2/
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -3 🙁
      1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
        Wrong: Apple Tracking definition (developer.apple.com/app-store/user-privacy-and-data-use/) is aligned with the rest of the web. Firefox: wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Anti_tracking_policy W3C: w3.org/TR/tracking-compliance/ @eric_seufert/1387044028823207943 3/
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
        1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
          Yes, you can go further and use an ad-blocker (uBlock Origin on the web, NextDNS on Apps for example), but Apple doesn't want to destroy advertising. @eric_seufert/1387044030815502357 4/
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
          1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
            I haven't yet seen any example of "unfair" treatment in ATT, just adtech lobbyists mixing "tracking" & 1st party personnalized ads. @eric_seufert/1387044035404001288 5/
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood -4 🙁
            1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
              Maybe an ePrivacy violation here (Apple personnalized ads are opt-out and not opt-in), but no double standard. Google & Facebook are doing the same on iOS (and many other companies with 1st-party data). @eric_seufert/1387044037241102349 6/
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -3 🙁
              1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
                "Some" = the web (except adtech lobbyists), cf. the W3C or Firefox definitions above. @eric_seufert/1387044039011168257 7/
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -2 🙁
                1. …in reply to @pixeldetracking
                  Yes, users would probably decline. Apple could indeed go further. But no double standard here (Google, Facebook and others are doing the same). Note that ATT is also consistant with Safari ITP (finally, Apple is aligning Apps with Web). @eric_seufert/1387044040416190466 8/
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo pixeldetracking’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0