All Tweets #8,253–#8,302
All 8,402 tweets, newest first. Not including retweets.
-
RT @jason_kint: Tap tap. I should point out this decision will also worry another company greatly. You know, the company who has leveraged…Permalink On twitter.com
Retweet
-
RT @jason_kint: Here is a link to the press release (curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-07/cp230113en.pdf) from the European Court of Justice along with the a thread wh…Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @EU_EDPB: The EDPB notes that the #ECJ in its judgment C-252/21 concurs with the EDPB’s position that controllers can only rely on contr…Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @MBarczentewicz: I just published an expanded preliminary analysis of the EU Court's new Meta judgment on my website. One additional thi…Permalink On twitter.com
-
@amrit_lohia @NOYBeu @EUCourtPress my arguments barczentewicz.com/post/the-cjeus-decision-in-metas-competition-case-consequences-for-personalized-advertising-under-the-gdpr-part-1/Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@amrit_lohia @NOYBeu @EUCourtPress I don't know, but paragraph 102 is included in sections that answer tracking questionsPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@nataliabielova I believe it's mainly used as a B2B tool, hence not visible in measurement paperPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@Cellular_PP Le communiqué de presse est assez explicite sur les « données off Facebook » curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-07/cp230113fr.pdfPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@Cellular_PP Qu'est-ce qui te fait dire que ce jugement s'appliquerait à des cas "hors tracking" (intra Facebook app par exemple) ?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -3 🙁
-
@PrivacyMatters I read it in french curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=275125&pageIndex=0&doclang=FR&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1652408 It was about data about user activities on and off the social network, the "tracking" part was key, and the full judgement makes multiple mentions to this "tracking"Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
RT @gabrielazanfir: This is a case concerning a decision by the Federal German Antitrust regulator against Meta. The case refers to the com…Permalink On twitter.com
-
@maxschrems Only for "tracking" if I correctly read @pixeldetracking/1676197611223621634?s=20Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@PrivacyMatters only for "tracking" if I correctly read the court @pixeldetracking/1676197611223621634?s=20Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@repasi I'm not sure here @pixeldetracking/1676197611223621634?s=20Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
RT @MBarczentewicz: 1/ What must you know about today’s potentially momentous decision from the EU’s highest court (CJEU) in Meta’s case? (…Permalink On twitter.com
-
"L’opérateur a depuis lors corrigé une partie des manquements sanctionnés." 😬 Et pourquoi pas l'intégralité des manquements sanctionnés ? 🤔 2 millions d'euros pour Google : pas cher payé pour continuer de bafouer nos lois... 😈 @dgccrf/1676149753686507520Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 3 Retweets
❤️ 5 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
@NOYBeu @EUCourtPress I think this is "only" about "tracking"? - Using Facebook data for personalized ads on Instagram - Using websites & apps data for personalized ads on Facebook - etc Where you indeed need consent. No mention to the legal basis if you "only" use FB data for personalized ads on FBPermalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
La CJUE ne mentionne pas la base légale pour les traitements au sein d'une seule appli: utiliser mes seules données Instagram pour de la publicité personnalisée sur Instagram. => Meta s'appuie ici sur l'intérêt légitime, cette base reste à challenger (contrat déjà invalide) 2/2Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Je pense qu'il y a un problème d'interprétation chez @NOYBeu, la CJUE traite seulement de la base légale pour du "tracking" (exemple: utiliser mes données Facebook, ou de sites tiers pour de la publicité personnalisée sur Instagram). => Seul le consentement est valable 1/2 @NOYBeu/1676140191226970114Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood 0
-
RT @EUCourtPress: #ECJ: A national #competition authority examining an abuse of a dominant position may also find that the #GDPR has been i…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Yet another privacy nightmare (Twitter clone), by Facebook 👀Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 12 Retweets
❤️ 23 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Ping @CNIL 👋 @NOYBeu/1675869361721036801Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
RT @Morgan_Schmiedt: L'autorité suédoise a le courage de sanctionner l'utilisation de Google Analytics, contrairement à la CNIL qui se cont…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood -4 🙁
-
RT @RiverTamYDN: What's that renewal date?Permalink On twitter.com
-
RT @vtoubiana: Google updates its privacy policy to tell users that publicly available information can be used to train AI models : https:/…Permalink On twitter.com
-
@_RDemol @SirdataGroup elle est certes compliqué mais pas impossible, ils peuvent toujours hasher les quelques gclid qui sont arrivés sur le site web du client dans la fenêtre de temps du clic, et regarder s’il y a match. ou tu ajoutes un salt ?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@_RDemol @SirdataGroup Mais pourquoi vous le supprimez pas par défaut du coup ?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@_RDemol @SirdataGroup Mais à quoi ça sert s’il est hashé ? Google a besoin de la version non haschéPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@_RDemol @SirdataGroup Le gclid est-il toujours envoyé par défaut à Google @pixeldetracking/1640754189054754816?s=20 ?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
RT @TimSweeneyEpic: The internet feels increasingly broken. News sites are paywalled or account walled, Reddit is nag walled, Google search…Permalink On twitter.com
-
@elineyaca Because of Schrems II, data transfers to the US cnil.fr/en/qa-cnils-formal-notices-concerning-use-google-analyticsPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood 0
-
@Rathmox Et je vois que c’est payant hors SafariPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@Rathmox C’est pas très clair pour moi, ils ont une app qui combine tout, non ? Safari + autres applisPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
@Rathmox Oui c’est pareil non ? Via DNSPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@TousTimbres Je ne sais pas 🤷♂️Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@Rathmox Si par exemple, moi j’utilise NextDNSPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
RT @mikarv: Browsing information is being accessed from your terminal device for reasons not necessary for a service you have requested, ye…Permalink On twitter.com
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
♻️ 6 Retweets
❤️ 9 Favorites
Mood 0
-
RT @ANderagakura: I guess it’s like PO/PMs in advertising industry and using an ad blockerPermalink On twitter.com
-
Merci la publicité 👏Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 9 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
RT @Thomasbcn: "Got it/settings" the latest call-to-action "consent" #darkpattern from Google to force opt-in their new toy (announced for…Permalink On twitter.com
-
YouTube latest experiment bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/youtube-tests-restricting-ad-blocker-users-to-3-video-views/ 💩Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 5 Retweets
❤️ 11 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
Where is the reject button? 🤔 @pbannist/1674439662918684673Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 5 Retweets
❤️ 11 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
RT @Thomasbcn: "Making the world information useful"Permalink On twitter.com
-
@amadeuswilhelm 😅 sérieusement, y a rien d’obligatoire à proposer un « single sign on » type celui de GooglePermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@sam_kassor Bonsoir, ça ne m’étonnerait pas tant :)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
